Car comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIvsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022

1.6 T-GDI

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2025-2026
VS

Mitsubishi ASX II

1.3 Turbo

158 hp1333 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,345 kg
    2,965 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    536 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
180hp134kW
158hp118kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,466kg3,232lb
1,345kg2,965lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
1,834kg4,043lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
83.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
76.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
40.1s
Calculated
64.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
735km457mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,333cc81cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,227mm166in
Width
1,826mm72in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,495mm59in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,639mm104in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,573mm62in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance-
174mm7in
Trunk volume
426L
536L
Max trunk volume
1,378L
1,275L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboPowerTorque
  • Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.1 s
64.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI has 22 hp more than Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1,345 kg
2,965 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI8.5 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo8.5 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
735 km
457 mi
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.5 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
735 km
457 mi
814 km
506 mi
Trunk score
426 L
15.0 cu ft
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 121 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T-GDI
1.6 T-GDI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
1.3 Turbo
1.5 VGT
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.6 T-GDI
GLB 220
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1.3 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20251.5 TSI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
40 TDI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.3 Turbo
35 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.3 Turbo
C 1.5
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI vs Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster