Car comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II

GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

204 hp1591 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2013-2015
VS

Volkswagen Beetle (A5)

2.0 TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    716 km
    445 mi
  • Largest trunk
    380 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    68/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,448kg3,192lb
1,439kg3,172lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
223 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
92.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
88.0s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
37.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
716km445mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,591cc97cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,310mm170in
4,278mm168in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,808mm71in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,486mm59in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,537mm100in
Front track-
1,578mm62in
Rear track-
1,544mm61in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
310L
Max trunk volume
1,225L
905L
Doors
3
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
53L
55L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiVolkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI: Power
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI5,100 rpm-5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
37.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
223 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
204 hp
152 kW
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 4 hp (3 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
1,439 kg
3,172 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
223 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi7.7 s
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI7.5 s

Although Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi has more power, Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
716 km
445 mi
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
204 hp
152 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
223 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,278 mm
168.4 in
Height
1,486 mm
58.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
1,439 kg
3,172 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,278 mm
168.4 in
Height
1,486 mm
58.5 in
Range score
716 km
445 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
-
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiVolkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI

  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI
GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsSeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
RSI 3.2
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenNEW Beetle (9C)RSI 3.2
GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
1.8 TFSI
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsAUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenBeetle Convertible (A5)2.0 TSI
GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Cooper S 1.6
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenBeetle Convertible (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI
GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
B 250
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsMercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250
2.0 TFSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (5-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (3-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi vs Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster