Car comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsLancia Delta III (844) · Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II

GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

204 hp1591 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2013-2015
VS

Lancia Delta III (844) · Facelift 2011

1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

200 hp1742 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2011-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    744 km
    462 mi
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,448kg3,192lb
1,430kg3,153lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
92.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
85.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
32.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
716km445mi
Calculated
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,591cc97cu in
1,742cc106cu in
Length
4,310mm170in
4,520mm178in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,499mm59in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,538mm61in
Rear track-
1,531mm60in
Trunk volume
380L
420L
Max trunk volume
1,225L
1,190L
Doors
3
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
58L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiLancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16VPowerTorque
  • Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: Power / Torque
  • Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V5,000 rpm1,400 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
32.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi has 4 hp more than Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
1,430 kg
3,153 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi has more power, Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
204 hp
152 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
200 hp
149 kW
7.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
LanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
Range score
716 km
445 mi
744 km
462 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
-
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiLancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lancia Delta III (844) Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V

  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 18 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi vs Lancia Delta III (844) · Facelift 2011 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster