Car comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDivsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia Pro Cee'd II

GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

204 hp1591 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2013-2015
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    716 km
    445 mi
  • Largest trunk
    380 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    68/100

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Lightest
    1,330 kg
    2,932 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    143 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    157 g/km
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
204hp152kW
190hp142kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,448kg3,192lb
1,330kg2,932lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
92.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
83.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
42.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
716km445mi
Calculated
691km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,591cc97cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,310mm170in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,595mm102in
Front track-
1,531mm60in
Rear track-
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,225L
1,080L
Doors
3
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
53L
47L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
157g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
42.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
204 hp
152 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi has 14 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,330 kg
2,932 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
716 km
445 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
691 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
204 hp
152 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaPro Cee'd IIGT 1.6i 16V T-GDiMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
204 hp
152 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,448 kg
3,192 lb
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,310 mm
169.7 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
716 km
445 mi
691 km
429 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
157 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDiMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 50 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Is 118 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Kia Pro Cee'd II GT 1.6i 16V T-GDi vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster