Kia Cee'd II
Car comparison
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16VvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions148 g/km
- Best estimated range734 km456 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,448kg3,192lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | 734km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,591cc97cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,318L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V has 14 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.6 s |
Although Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V has more power, Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 716 km 445 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 734 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | 734 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 68 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























