Kia Cee'd II
Car comparison
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16VvsAUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
1.8 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range893 km555 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score92/100
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,448kg3,192lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,591cc97cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,318L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V has 24 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 7.2 s |
Although Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 716 km 445 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Is 198 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 42 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























