Kia Cee'd II
Car comparison
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16VvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best estimated range716 km445 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,448kg3,192lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,591cc97cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,318L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V has 14 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 716 km 445 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaCee'd IIGT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,448 kg 3,192 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia Cee'd II GT 1.6 T-GDi 16V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 118 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























