Kaiyi X7
Car comparison
Kaiyi X7 2.0T · Stage 3vsKaiyi X7 2.0T · Stage 2vsKaiyi X7 2.0T · Stage 1vsKaiyi X7 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKaiyi X7
2.0T (Stage 2)
Kaiyi X7
2.0T (Stage 1)
Kaiyi X7
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful357 hp266 kW
- Highest torque581 Nm429 lb-ft
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight201 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions202 g/km
- Best estimated range706 km439 mi
- Largest trunk546 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | KaiyiX72.0T238 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 357hp266kW+119 hp | 309hp231kW+71 hp | 281hp209kW+43 hp | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 581Nm429lb-ft+206 Nm | 506Nm373lb-ft+131 Nm | 458Nm337lb-ft+83 Nm | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.2s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph-16.1 s Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-10.8 s Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph-7.1 s Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s-1.8 s | 7.0s-1.2 s | 7.4s-0.8 s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s-25.7 s Calculated | 31.7s-19.4 s Calculated | 37.5s-13.6 s Calculated | 51.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.6s-1.1 s Calculated | 7.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 15.0s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 706km439mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,710mm185in | 4,710mm185in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,964mm77in | 1,964mm77in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,705mm67in | 1,705mm67in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 546L | 546L | 546L | 546L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,566L | 1,566L | 1,566L | 1,566L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 202g/km | 202g/km | 202g/km | 202g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp: Power / Torque
- Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp: Power / Torque
- Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hp: Power / Torque
- Kaiyi X7 2.0T 238 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | KaiyiX72.0T238 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 31.7 s | 37.5 s | 51.1 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.0 s | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 357 hp 266 kW |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 309 hp 231 kW |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 281 hp 209 kW |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 238 hp 177 kW |
Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp has 119 hp more than Kaiyi X7 2.0T 238 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Kaiyi X7 2.0T 238 hp and Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp: 119 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 506 Nm 373 lb-ft |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 458 Nm 337 lb-ft |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 6.4 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 7.0 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 7.4 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp and Kaiyi X7 2.0T 238 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp and Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 706 km 439 mi |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 706 km 439 mi |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 706 km 439 mi |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 706 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 357 hp 266 kW | 6.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 309 hp 231 kW | 7.0 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 281 hp 209 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 3)357 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 2)309 hp | KaiyiX72.0T (Stage 1)281 hp | KaiyiX72.0T238 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 357 hp 266 kW | 309 hp 231 kW | 281 hp 209 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft | 506 Nm 373 lb-ft | 458 Nm 337 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 706 km 439 mi | 706 km 439 mi | 706 km 439 mi | 706 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 202 g/km | 202 g/km | 202 g/km | 202 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | 546 L 19.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp | Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp | Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hp | Kaiyi X7 2.0T 238 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Kaiyi X7 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























