Nissan 350Z (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score65/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 298hp222kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 411Nm303lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 88.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 22.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,316mm52in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 22.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 15 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 and Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 298 hp 222 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 59 Nm more
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























