Nissan 350Z (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsCadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,316mm52in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 291g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has 12 hp more than Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 5.9 s |
Although Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 291 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























