Cadillac XLR
Car comparison
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32VvsNissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 350Z (Z33)
3.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range614 km382 mi
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 283hp211kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 614km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,565cc279cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,513mm178in | 4,310mm170in |
| Width | 1,836mm72in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,316mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,685mm106in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | 328L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 291g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has 42 hp more than Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 5.9 s |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 614 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 614 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 291 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V | Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























