Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsCadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XLR
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Fastest top speed267 km/h166 mph
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.3 L/100 km14.4 mpg US17.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions262 g/km
- Best estimated range582 km362 mi
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best performance score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | - |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 81.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 582km362mi Calculated | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,386cc207cu in | 4,565cc279cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,513mm178in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,279mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,685mm106in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 328L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | 291g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V has 30 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6.1 s |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 582 km 362 mi |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | CadillacXLR4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 582 km 362 mi | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | 291 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 | Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Cadillac XLR 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























