BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335ivsNissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 350Z (Z33)
3.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 20.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 663km412mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,310mm170in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,395mm55in | 1,316mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 235L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i: Power / Torque
- Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 20.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW |
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 7 hp more than BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i and Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 5.7 s |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 5.8 s |
Although Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has more power, BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i and Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E92)335i | Nissan350Z (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 663 km 412 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E92) 335i
- Has 48 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Nissan 350Z (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























