Car comparison

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurbovsJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32)

3.0 Twin Turbo

283 hp2960 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe1990-1995
VS

Jaguar XJS Coupe

6.0

318 hp5994 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1991-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,644 kg
    3,624 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Most powerful
    318 hp
    237 kW
  • Highest torque
    463 Nm
    341 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    174 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    685 km
    425 mi
  • Largest trunk
    407 L
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurboJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
283hp211kW
318hp237kW
Torque
375Nm277lb-ft
463Nm341lb-ft
Curb weight
1,644kg3,624lb
1,825kg4,023lb
Gross weight
2,015kg4,442lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
81.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
95.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
21.5s
Calculated
29.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
625km388mi
Calculated
685km425mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,960cc181cu in
5,994cc366cu in
Length
4,520mm178in
4,820mm190in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,793mm71in
Height
1,255mm49in
1,279mm50in
Wheelbase
2,570mm101in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,489mm59in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume
326L
407L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
89L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurboJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0PowerTorque
  • Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo6,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm
JaguarXJS Coupe6.05,400 rpm3,750 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurboJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.5 s
29.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
283 hp
211 kW
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has 35 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
375 Nm
277 lb-ft
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
463 Nm
341 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
1,644 kg
3,624 lb
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
1,825 kg
4,023 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo5.9 s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.07.4 s

Although Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has more power, Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
625 km
388 mi
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
685 km
425 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
283 hp
211 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW
7.4 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
283 hp
211 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,255 mm
49.4 in
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
318 hp
237 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
Power
283 hp
211 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
318 hp
237 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurboJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
283 hp
211 kW
318 hp
237 kW
Torque
375 Nm
277 lb-ft
463 Nm
341 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,644 kg
3,624 lb
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
Fuel consumption
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
326 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,255 mm
49.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in
Range score
625 km
388 mi
685 km
425 mi
Trunk score
326 L
11.5 cu ft
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurboJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Consumption11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.60 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.54 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,940 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo

  • Is 181 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 88 Nm more
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 81 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 Turbo
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsNissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo
6.0
5.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsAston MartinVirage5.3
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
6.0
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0i
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
6.0
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
3.0 Twin Turbo
5.3
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
6.0
CL 500 V8
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8
3.0 Twin Turbo
2.8 24V Biturbo
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsMaseratiGhibli II2.8 24V Biturbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
3.0 i V6 Turbo
VS
Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin TurbovsAlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
6.0
3.2 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
6.0
Turbo 3.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsPorsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo vs Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster