Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6vsSubaru WRX STI 2.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Subaru WRX STI

2.5

300 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,200 km
    746 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Subaru WRX STI 2.5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,500 kg
    3,307 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    200 hp/t
    149 kW/t
    5.0 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6SubaruWRX STI2.5
Power
300hp224kW
300hp224kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
407Nm300lb-ft
Curb weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,500kg3,307lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
47.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
19.0s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,200km746mi
Calculated
577km358mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,540mm61in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
135mm5in
Trunk volume
505L
460L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
60L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
242g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Subaru WRX STI 2.5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
  • Subaru WRX STI 2.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
SubaruWRX STI2.56,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6SubaruWRX STI2.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.0 s
16.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
107 mph
183 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
SubaruWRX STI2.5
300 hp
224 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
SubaruWRX STI2.5
407 Nm
300 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
SubaruWRX STI2.5
1,500 kg
3,307 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SubaruWRX STI2.5
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V66.2 s
SubaruWRX STI2.55.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI 2.5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STI2.5
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Subaru WRX STI 2.5: 4.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
SubaruWRX STI2.5
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,200 km
746 mi
SubaruWRX STI2.5
577 km
358 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SubaruWRX STI2.5
300 hp
224 kW
5.2 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
SubaruWRX STI2.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STI2.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.2 s
SubaruWRX STI2.5
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
SubaruWRX STI2.5
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6SubaruWRX STI2.5
Power
300 hp
224 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,200 km
746 mi
577 km
358 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
242 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Subaru WRX STI 2.5
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km18.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi29.29 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year2,730 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Has 293 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 623 km (387 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 98 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Subaru WRX STI 2.5

  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
Subaru WRX STI 2.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsSubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsSubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.5
2.5
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsSubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.5
2.0 TFSI
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TFSI
3.0d V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.5
2.0 T6
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.5
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
SubaruWRX STI2.5vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)Facelift 20133.0 TFSI V6
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 vs Subaru WRX STI 2.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster