Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

1.5 T3

152 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    106 hp/t
    79 kW/t
    9.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,375 km
    854 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
Power
163hp122kW
152hp113kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,533kg3,380lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
80.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
70.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
34.3s
Calculated
45.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,375km854mi
Calculated
1,164km723mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
136mm5in
Trunk volume
505L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
68L
CO2 emissions
104g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T35,000 rpm1,700-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.3 s
45.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
152 hp
113 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 11 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
1,533 kg
3,380 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T38.6 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,375 km
854 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
1,164 km
723 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
152 hp
113 kW
8.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
8.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3
Power
163 hp
122 kW
152 hp
113 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,533 kg
3,380 lb
Fuel consumption
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,375 km
854 mi
1,164 km
723 mi
CO2 score
104 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Consumption4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.00 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.27 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used600 L159 US gal132 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,050 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3

  • Is 12 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Volvo S60 II 1.5 T3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.5 T3
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1.5 T3
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.5 T3
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsVolvoS902.0 T4
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
1.5 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1.5 T3
1.4 TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1.5 T3
2.0 TDCi
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster