Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best economy score97/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,375 km854 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,375km854mi Calculated | 1,237km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | 99g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,375 km 854 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,237 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,375 km 854 mi | 1,237 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | 99 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km | 6.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year | 997.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























