Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024
VS

Lynk & Co 03

2.0TD

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,179 km
    732 mi
  • Largest trunk
    448 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dLynk & Co032.0TD
Power
204hp152kW
190hp142kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight-
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
63.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
29.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,179km732mi
Calculated
806km501mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,962mm195in
4,657mm183in
Width-
1,840mm72in
Height
1,456mm57in
1,472mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
448L
414L
Max trunk volume
1,474L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dLynk & Co 03 2.0TDPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
Lynk & Co032.0TD4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dLynk & Co032.0TD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
29.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Lynk & Co032.0TD
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
Lynk & Co032.0TD
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
235 km/h
146 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d7.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD7.4 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,179 km
732 mi
Lynk & Co032.0TD
806 km
501 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
448 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dLynk & Co032.0TD
Power
204 hp
152 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
448 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Range score
1,179 km
732 mi
806 km
501 mi
Trunk score
448 L
15.8 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 372 km (231 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 34 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0TD
E 200
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.0TD
A 220
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 220
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0TD
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0TD
A 220d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220d
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster