Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 E 200vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020

E 200

197 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2023
VS

Lynk & Co 03

2.0TD

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    806 km
    501 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
197hp147kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,690kg3,726lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,425kg5,346lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
63.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
28.7s
Calculated
29.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
685km426mi
Calculated
806km501mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,935mm194in
4,657mm183in
Width
1,852mm73in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,472mm58in
Wheelbase
2,939mm116in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,604mm63in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,608mm63in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200Lynk & Co 03 2.0TDPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 2005,500-6,100 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
Lynk & Co032.0TD4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.7 s
29.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
197 hp
147 kW
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 has 7 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Lynk & Co032.0TD
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
Lynk & Co032.0TD
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
232 km/h
144 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 2007.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD7.4 s

Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 has more power, Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
685 km
426 mi
Lynk & Co032.0TD
806 km
501 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
197 hp
147 kW
7.6 s
232 km/h
144 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,935 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
197 hp
147 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.4 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,935 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Range score
685 km
426 mi
806 km
501 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 126 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 220d
2.0TD
A 220
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 220
E 200
E 250 BlueTEC
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC
2.0TD
E 200
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020E 200
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
2.0TD
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
E 200
E 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250d
2.0TD
A 220d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220d
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 E 200 vs Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster