Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Peugeot 408 II

1.6 THP

167 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,341 km
    834 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Most powerful
    167 hp
    125 kW
  • Lightest
    1,415 kg
    3,120 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
Power
163hp122kW
167hp125kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
245Nm181lb-ft
Curb weight
1,555kg3,428lb
1,415kg3,120lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
-
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
66.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
35.0s
Calculated
37.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,341km834mi
Calculated
898km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,750mm187in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,488mm59in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,550mm61in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
505L
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
53L
CO2 emissions
109g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THPPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP6,000 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.0 s
37.6 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
167 hp
125 kW

Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
245 Nm
181 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
1,415 kg
3,120 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
227 km/h
141 mph
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.7 s
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,341 km
834 mi
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
898 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.7 s
227 km/h
141 mph
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
167 hp
125 kW
8.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
Power
167 hp
125 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
Power
167 hp
125 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
8.7 s
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Peugeot408 II1.6 THP
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
Power
163 hp
122 kW
167 hp
125 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
245 Nm
181 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.2 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Fuel consumption
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Range score
1,341 km
834 mi
898 km
558 mi
CO2 score
109 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.17 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.55 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used615 L162 US gal135 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,076 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 443 km (275 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 50 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.6 THP
C 220d
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1.6 THP
E 220 BlueTEC
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.6 THP
2.0 TD
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsChevroletCruze SedanFacelift 20132.0 TD
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
1.6 THP
2.0d
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1.6 THP
2.5
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
1.6 THP
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
Peugeot408 II1.6 THPvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0d
D180
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP - car comparison - FastVsFaster