Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | 1,535km954mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 735 km 457 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | 1,535 km 954 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 800 km (497 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























