Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8vsJaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
3.0d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,842kg4,061lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 556km345mi Calculated | 1,200km746mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,571mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has 116 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 116 hp (87 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 7.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 556 km 345 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 1,200 km 746 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 556 km 345 mi | 1,200 km 746 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 | Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.05 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,308 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Has 116 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Uses 7.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 644 km (400 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























