Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L SupervsJaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X250)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score74/100
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 541Nm399lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,842kg4,061lb |
| Gross weight | 2,275kg5,016lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 237hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 5,215mm205in | 4,961mm195in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,159mm124in | 2,909mm115in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,571mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has 16 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has more power, Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V L Super
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























