Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30tvsVolvo V90 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,763 kg3,887 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best estimated range961 km597 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | VolvoV902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,763kg3,887lb | 1,956kg4,312lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 20.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 961km597mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,955mm195in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,496mm59in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | VolvoV902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 20.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 6.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 6.1 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T6 has more power, Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 961 km 597 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | VolvoV902.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 961 km 597 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t | Volvo V90 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t
- Is 193 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























