Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
30t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range961 km597 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,744 kg3,845 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,763kg3,887lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 796km494mi Calculated | 961km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | - | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 796 km 494 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 961 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,763 kg 3,887 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 796 km 494 mi | 961 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30t
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 165 km (103 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























