Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,351 km839 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,744 kg3,845 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,744kg3,845lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 20.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 796km494mi Calculated | 1,351km839mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 77L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 20.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 796 km 494 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,351 km 839 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,744 kg 3,845 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 796 km 494 mi | 1,351 km 839 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 91 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 555 km (345 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























