Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 T6vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
30d V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,849 kg4,076 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,082 km672 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,956kg4,312lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 21.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 1,082km672mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 21.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6 and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6 and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 769 km 478 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 1,082 km 672 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30d V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 1,082 km 672 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 T6 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 30d V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 313 km (194 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























