Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024
VS

Skoda Octavia IV Scout

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,138 km
    707 mi
  • Largest trunk
    716 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
190hp142kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,678kg3,699lb
Gross weight-
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
69.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
29.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
873km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,964mm195in
4,703mm185in
Width-
1,829mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,487mm59in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,533mm60in
Ground clearance-
161mm6in
Trunk volume
716L
640L
Max trunk volume
1,695L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
29.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
155 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
1,678 kg
3,699 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI7.2 s

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,138 km
707 mi
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
873 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,487 mm
58.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,678 kg
3,699 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,487 mm
58.5 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
873 km
542 mi
Trunk score
716 L
25.3 cu ft
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 76 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI

  • Is 117 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)20d
2.0 TSI
320d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
2.0d
40 TDI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
2.0d
C 200
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster