Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,138 km
    707 mi
  • Largest trunk
    716 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204hp152kW
204hp152kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight-
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
29.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,964mm195in
4,755mm187in
Width-
1,841mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,582mm62in
Trunk volume
716L
490L
Max trunk volume
1,695L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
29.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,138 km
707 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
658 km
409 mi
Trunk score
716 L
25.3 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 480 km (298 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 226 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster