Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Scout
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,146 km712 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,541kg3,397lb | 1,678kg3,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 69.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,146km712mi Calculated | 873km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | 4,703mm185in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,510mm59in | 1,487mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,548mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,533mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 611L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,624L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,146 km 712 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,146 km 712 mi | 873 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 137 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 273 km (170 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























