Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsSkoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024

Skoda Octavia IV Combi

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

Fastest top speed
240 km/h
149 mph Unrestricted
230 km/h
143 mph Restricted
Most powerful
204 hp
152 kW
Highest torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,138 km
707 mi
Largest trunk
716 L
Best overall score
65/100
Best performance score
52/100
Best economy score
91/100
Best practicality score
92/100

Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.9 s
Lightest
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
Best power-to-weight
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI
Power	204hp152kW	190hp142kW
Torque	430Nm317lb-ft	320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight	1,795kg3,957lb	1,671kg3,684lb
Gross weight	-	2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated	229 km/h 142 mph
To 99% top speed	82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated	64.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.8s	6.9s
0-200 km/h	29.2s Calculated	27.4s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.4s Calculated	6.6s Calculated
Fuel consumption	5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK	7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.6s Calculated	14.9s Calculated
Power-to-weight	114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated	114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated	192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,138km707mi Calculated	743km462mi Calculated
Displacement	1,997cc122cu in	1,984cc121cu in
Length	4,964mm195in	4,689mm185in
Width	-	1,829mm72in
Height	1,494mm59in	1,468mm58in
Wheelbase	2,960mm117in	2,680mm106in
Front track	1,602mm63in	1,543mm61in
Rear track	1,604mm63in	1,535mm60in
Ground clearance	-	141mm6in
Trunk volume	716L	640L
Max trunk volume	1,695L	1,700L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	66L	55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	4,250 rpm	1,750-2,500 rpm	4,500 rpm
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	4,200-6,000 rpm	1,500-4,100 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.4 s	6.6 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.8 s	6.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	29.2 s	27.4 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited	229 km/h 142 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	7.0 s	6.6 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.3 s	9.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.2 s	12.6 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.6 s	14.9 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	153 km/h 95 mph	158 km/h 98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	204 hp 152 kW
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	190 hp 142 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 14 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	430 Nm 317 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	320 Nm 236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	1,795 kg 3,957 lb
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	1,671 kg 3,684 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	229 km/h 142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	6.9 s

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	1,138 km 707 mi
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	743 km 462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	204 hp 152 kW	7.8 s	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	190 hp 142 kW	6.9 s	229 km/h 142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d

Power	204 hp 152 kW
0-100 km/h	7.8 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	716 L 25.3 cu ft
Length	4,964 mm 195.4 in
Height	1,494 mm 58.8 in

SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI

Power	190 hp 142 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 229 km/h 142 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	640 L 22.6 cu ft
Length	4,689 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,468 mm 57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d

Power	204 hp 152 kW
0-100 km/h	7.8 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

5.8 L/100 km

40.6 mpg US

48.7 mpg UK

SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI

Power	190 hp 142 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 229 km/h 142 mph

7.4 L/100 km

31.8 mpg US

38.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK	7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK	6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d	114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI	114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp	7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d

SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI

Power

204 hp

152 kW

190 hp

142 kW

Torque

430 Nm

317 lb-ft

320 Nm

236 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.8 s

6.9 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

240 km/h149 mph

Restricted

230 km/h143 mph

229 km/h

142 mph

Lightness

1,795 kg

3,957 lb

1,671 kg

3,684 lb

Fuel consumption

5.8 L/100 km

40.6 mpg US

48.7 mpg UK

7.4 L/100 km

31.8 mpg US

38.2 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	716 L 25.3 cu ft
Length	4,964 mm 195.4 in
Height	1,494 mm 58.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	640 L 22.6 cu ft
Length	4,689 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,468 mm 57.8 in

Range score

1,138 km

707 mi

743 km

462 mi

Trunk score

716 L

25.3 cu ft

640 L

22.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

114 hp/t

85 kW/t

8.8 kg/hp

114 hp/t

85 kW/t

8.8 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d	Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI
Consumption	5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK	7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.15 LC100 km	12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.33 LC100 mi	20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	870 L230 US gal191 UK gal	1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,523 LC/year	1,943 LC/year