Skoda Octavia IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,146 km712 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,541kg3,397lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 743km462mi Calculated | 1,146km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,639mm183in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 611L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,624L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 743 km 462 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,146 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TSI | VolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 743 km 462 mi | 1,146 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Golf VIII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 403 km (250 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























