Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,435 kg
    3,164 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    132 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,320 km
    820 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,435kg3,164lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,085kg4,597lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
78.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
87.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
42.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,065km661mi
Calculated
1,320km820mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,856mm191in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
149mm6in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
660L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions
140g/km
132g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI4,000-6,200 rpm1,450-3,900 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
42.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
142 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
1,435 kg
3,164 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI8.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
1,065 km
661 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,320 km
820 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
8.1 s
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
8.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,435 kg
3,164 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
1,065 km
661 mi
1,320 km
820 mi
CO2 score
140 g/km
132 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Is 335 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 255 km (159 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)1.8 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1.8 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
2.0d
1.6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsSubaruLevorg1.6
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster