Skoda Superb III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSIvsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,856mm191in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 140g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 4,000-6,200 rpm | 1,450-3,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 8.1 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI and Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III Combi1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 140 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.8 TSI
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























