Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight106 hp/t79 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best estimated range1,375 km854 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score96/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 42.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,375km854mi Calculated | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,700L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 42.7 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has 17 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 8.9 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,375 km 854 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,320 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,375 km 854 mi | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























