Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2017
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Lightest
    1,392 kg
    3,069 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    142 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
230hp172kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,392kg3,069lb
1,705kg3,759lb
Gross weight
1,958kg4,317lb
-
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
73.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
23.0s
Calculated
26.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
806km501mi
Calculated
1,088km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
110mm4in
Trunk volume
610L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
74L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,700-6,200 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.0 s
26.1 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has 20 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,392 kg
3,069 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
1,705 kg
3,759 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI6.8 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.07.1 s

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
806 km
501 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
1,088 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
6.8 s
247 km/h
153 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
7.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.8 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
Power
230 hp
172 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.1 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,392 kg
3,069 lb
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
806 km
501 mi
1,088 km
676 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 313 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
RS 2.0 TSI
525d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster