Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight344 hp/t256 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score92/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 37.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 48.8s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t256kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 721km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,713mm186in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 227 km/h 141 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 has 50 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 721 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 R 5.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























