Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 111g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 111 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























