Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best estimated range1,237 km769 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score97/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,364 kg3,007 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,364kg3,007lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,237km769mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 99g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 13 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 1,364 kg 3,007 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,237 km 769 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,364 kg 3,007 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,237 km 769 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 99 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.65 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 997.50 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 1.4 TSI
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























