Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,237 km769 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score97/100
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Most powerful167 hp125 kW
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,237km769mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 99g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.4 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,237 km 769 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,237 km 769 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 99 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.65 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 997.50 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 135 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 339 km (210 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























