Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.5 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,474 kg3,250 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t82 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,474kg3,250lb | 1,533kg3,380lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 11 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























