Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,474kg3,250lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 651km404mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 651 km 404 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 124 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























