Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

200 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,731 km
    1,075 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,561kg3,441lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
73.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
27.2s
Calculated
27.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,731km1,075mi
Calculated
840km522mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,588mm63in
-
Rear track
1,585mm62in
-
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
63L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.2 s
27.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.6 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.07.7 s

Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,731 km
1,075 mi
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
840 km
522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,731 km
1,075 mi
840 km
522 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.83 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.98 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used585 L155 US gal129 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,024 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 891 km (553 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 31 kg lighter
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0
D180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 D4
C 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster