Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 840km522mi Calculated | 1,535km954mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 20 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 840 km 522 mi | 1,535 km 954 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 695 km (432 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 65 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























