Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,794kg3,955lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.4s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 448L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,474L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.4 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.7 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 264 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























