Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsJaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-type (X400)
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk452 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 635km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | 452L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 196 hp 146 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 14 hp more than Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 635 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 79 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























