Jaguar X-type (X400)
Car comparison
Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24VvsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 196hp146kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 241Nm178lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 635km395mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,495cc152cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 452L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 196 hp 146 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI has 4 hp more than Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 635 km 395 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarX-type (X400)2.5 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 196 hp 146 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 635 km 395 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar X-type (X400) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 39 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























