Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2016-2017
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2016-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,705 kg
    3,759 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    337 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.2 L/100 km
    14.5 mpg US
    17.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    408 L
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
575hp429kW
570hp425kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
1,705kg3,759lb
1,752kg3,862lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
55.5s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
10.4s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
337hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton
Calculated
364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
619km385mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,475mm176in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,311mm52in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,611mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
408L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
74L
CO2 emissions
269g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.4 s
7.9 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
210 km/h
131 mph
228 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
1,752 kg
3,862 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V83.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V62.8 s

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
619 km
385 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
3.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
575 hp
429 kW
570 hp
425 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
2.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
1,752 kg
3,862 lb
Fuel consumption
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
619 km
385 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
269 g/km
-
Trunk score
408 L
14.4 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
Consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.78 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.82 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,966 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 63 Nm more
  • Is 47 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 93 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
SVR 5.0 V8
S 6.0 V12
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsAston MartinV12 VantageS 6.0 V12
3.8 V6
4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsAston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster