Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight332 hp/t248 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Best economy score78/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful570 hp425 kW
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570hp425kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 637Nm470lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,752kg3,862lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 59.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 332hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,482mm176in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,627mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 408L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 249g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,300-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 has 20 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp 425 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 249 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8
- Has 43 Nm more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























