Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166)

GLS 400

333 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,884 kg
    4,154 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,100 km
    684 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
Power
300hp224kW
333hp248kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,884kg4,154lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Gross weight
2,570kg5,666lb
3,250kg7,165lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
93.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
29.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,100km684mi
Calculated
1,064km661mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
5,130mm202in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,934mm76in
Height
1,652mm65in
1,850mm73in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
3,075mm121in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
680L
Max trunk volume-
2,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
100L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
218g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 4005,250-6,000 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
29.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
333 hp
248 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400 has 33 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: 33 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
1,884 kg
4,154 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2,360 kg
5,203 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
241 km/h
150 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V66.2 s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 4006.6 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
1,100 km
684 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
1,064 km
661 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
241 km/h
150 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
333 hp
248 kW
6.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
Power
333 hp
248 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
Power
333 hp
248 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.2 s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
Power
300 hp
224 kW
333 hp
248 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
6.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,884 kg
4,154 lb
2,360 kg
5,203 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in
Range score
1,100 km
684 mi
1,064 km
661 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
218 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 476 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 59 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400

  • Has 33 hp more
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0d V6
3.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
GLS 400
GLS 400d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d
3.0d V6
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
GLS 400
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 350d
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
GLS 400
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 350d
3.0d V6
35i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
GLS 400
GLS 600 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
3.0d V6
35i
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
GLS 400
GLS 600 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 600 V8
3.0d V6
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarF-Pace3.0d V6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
GLS 400
GLS 680 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400vsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 680 V8
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 vs Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400 - car comparison - FastVsFaster